AMD Radeon RX 6600

MSRP $329.00

“The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is simply too costly, however on this market, nearly something flies.”


  • Above 60 fps at 1080p in most video games
  • Single- to triple-fan design out there
  • Solely 132 watts of complete board energy
  • {Hardware}-accelerated ray tracing


  • About 8% slower than the RTX 3060
  • Would not have entry to DLSS
  • Poor ray tracing efficiency with out upscaling

It’s unlucky, however the GPU scarcity has made it practically inconceivable to buy a very good graphics card deal. In comparison with the most effective graphics playing cards, AMD’s new RX 6600 isn’t stellar, and its record value simply barely manages to be acceptable. However in a time when graphics card costs are dictated by shortages and scalpers, the RX 6600 could possibly be the deal PC players are in search of.

It’s a petite card squarely focusing on 1080p players, and based mostly on my testing, it hits that mark effectively sufficient. The record value is greater than it needs to be, however the secondhand market usually costs Nvidia playing cards greater. You’ll probably be capable to purchase the RX 6600 for lower than the Nvidia RTX 3060, which is the cardboard AMD’s newest launch straight competes with.

As soon as the mud has settled on the scarcity, nevertheless, you can be left with a card that underperforms in comparison with the competitors. And with options like higher ray tracing and A.I.-assisted upscaling on Nvidia playing cards, the RX 6600 is a tricky promote.


Similar to the RX 6600 XT, AMD isn’t releasing a reference mannequin for the RX 6600. As a substitute, you’ll solely be capable to purchase add-in board accomplice (AIB) fashions — and AIBs have spoiled us with choices. From single-fan to triple-fan designs, there’s no scarcity of playing cards to select from.

AMD despatched me the triple-fan Gigabyte Eagle, which seems to be and feels much more spectacular than the RX 6600 has any proper to. The shell is completed with a matte coating, and the cardboard regarded wonderful displayed inside my Lian Li PC-011 Dynamic. Though one of many longer fashions out there at 11 inches, the Eagle nonetheless adheres to the dual-slot design of the opposite AIB fashions.

Gigabyte logon on AMD RX 6600.

The three followers are only for aesthetic factors, although. As I’ll dig into within the subsequent part, the RX 6600 solely has a board energy of 132 watts, and it doesn’t get too scorching beneath load. ASRock was in a position to squeeze the cardboard right into a single-fan design, and I don’t suppose it would wrestle with warmth an excessive amount of. Nonetheless, you will have loads of choices for AIB fashions, even when they’re extra for seems to be than sensible variations.

For ports, the Gigabyte Eagle comes with two DisplayPort 1.4a connections and two HDMI 2.1 connections. I might’ve most popular a 3rd DisplayPort connection over the second HDMI — even with HDMI 2.1 rising refresh charges, it is sensible to have three of 1 connection kind for triple-monitor setups as a substitute of splitting them. The RX 6600 is lower than the value of loads of screens, although, so that is most likely an edge case.

Trying by way of pictures of launch fashions supplied by AMD, I’m a fan of the Gigabyte Eagle and XFX Swift. For essentially the most part, although, AIBs didn’t go loopy with their designs. The PowerColor Hellhound goes somewhat additional with LED followers, however most producers caught with a standard black, dual-fan design.


The RX 6600 is the weakest of AMD’s RDNA 2 lineup. It options 12% fewer compute items than the RX 6600 XT for a 13% drop in value, however in any other case the playing cards are very comparable. They each include 8GB of GDDR6 reminiscence on a 128-bit bus, although the RX 6600 options decrease clock speeds total.

Compute Items Shading items Recreation Velocity Increase velocity Reminiscence capability TDP Worth
Radeon RX 6600 28 1,792 2.04GHz 2.49GHz 8GB GDDR6 132W $330
Radeon RX 6600 XT 32 2,048 2.35GHz 2.59GHz 8GB GDDR6 160W $380
Radeon RX 6700 XT 40 2,560 2.32GHz 2.58GHz 12GB GDDR6 230w $480
Radeon RX 6800 60 3,840 1.82GHz 2.11GHz 16GB GDDR6 250w $580
Radeon RX 6800 XT 72 4,608 2.02GHz 2.25GHz 16GB GDDR6 300W $649
Radeon RX 6900 XT 80 5,120 2.01GHz 2.25GHz 16GB GDDR6 300W $1,000

The RX 6600 needs to be about 15% under the XT mannequin, however my testing reveals a niche nearer to twenty%. That distinction is probably going on the again of clock velocity, which is able to drop your body charge. Nonetheless, the decrease velocity helped AMD obtain a board energy of solely 132W, permitting you to make use of the RX 6600 with as little as a 450W energy provide.

Nvidia solely recommends a 450W energy provide for the RTX 3060, and it has the identical record value because the RX 6600. AMD is stressing its performance-per-watt benefit over the RTX 3060 right here, with the RX 6600 providing as much as a 1.5x enhance to the metric over the RTX 3060. That doesn’t make an enormous distinction at most of these wattages, although, particularly for a performant gaming PC.

AMD playing cards historically promote for lower than Nvidia ones on the secondhand market, and the RX 6600 shouldn’t be any completely different.

Merely put, the RX 6600 is simply too costly. It attracts much less energy than the RTX 3060, positive, however it additionally isn’t as highly effective. It’s an analogous scenario to the RX 6600 XT and RTX 3060 Ti. You’re paying across the identical record value, however with a sizeable efficiency benefit in Nvidia’s nook.

Because the GPU scarcity has taught everybody, although, record value doesn’t imply something. The excellent news is that AMD playing cards historically promote for lower than Nvidia ones on the secondhand market, and the RX 6600 shouldn’t be any completely different. That pulls the favor again in AMD’s nook. The RX 6600 XT is probably not as highly effective because the RTX 3060 Ti, however it sells for nearly $200 much less on the secondhand market. I’d wager one thing comparable will occur with the RX 6600 and RTX 3060 just a few weeks after launch.


AMD RX 6600 among other graphics cards.

The RX 6600 is hard to gauge. AMD has in contrast it to the RTX 3060, however the firm additionally in contrast the RX 6600 XT to the RTX 3060. Based mostly on my testing at 1080p, the RX 6600 really sits under the RTX 3060, in need of a robust outing in Murderer’s Creed Valhalla. In actuality, the RX 6600 is nearer to the RTX 2060 Tremendous.

You may see my outcomes under. I ran checks from 1080p to 4K throughout Medium and Extremely presets, however the outcomes under are for 1080p with Extremely settings. I ran all of my checks off of a Essential MX500 2TB SSD inside a PC with an Intel Core i9-10900K and 32GB of RAM.

AMD RX 6600 AMD RX 6600 XT Nvidia RTX 3060 RTX 2060 Tremendous
3DMark Time Spy (GPU rating) 8,071 9,644 8,629 8,513
Purple Lifeless Redemption 2 59 fps 68 fps 65 fps 62 fps
Fortnite 98 fps 137 fps 132 fps 105 fps
Murderer’s Creed Valhalla 71 fps 83 fps 64 fps 66 fps
Battlefield V 120 fps 139 fps 123 fps 120 fps
Civilization VI 138 fps 161 fps 143 fps 150 fps

Essentially the most simple battle is the DirectX 12-based 3DMark Time Spy, which confirmed some important disparities for the RX 6600. The XT mannequin is about 20% sooner, whereas the RTX 3060 holds a stable 7% lead. Artificial benchmarks aren’t video games, however Time Spy reveals the variations in playing cards clearly — and the RX 6600 is on the backside of the pile.

That wasn’t true in all video games, although. Murderer’s Creed Valhalla is one instance the place the RX 6600 confirmed about an 11% enchancment over the RTX 3060. The XT mannequin nonetheless led, however Valhalla appears to favor AMD playing cards extra. Sadly, that wasn’t true in different titles. In Purple Lifeless Redemption 2, for instance, the RTX 3060 was about 10% sooner than the RX 6600.

Taking the 1080p Extremely outcomes collectively, the RTX 3060 is about 8% sooner whereas the RX 6600 XT is about 21% sooner. The RX 6600 is identical value (theoretically) because the RTX 3060, displaying that AMD is urgent the benefit of the GPU scarcity as soon as once more. To be clear, it’s a steal at $329 in comparison with what the RTX 3060 is promoting for. And given what the RX 6600 XT is promoting for, the non-XT mannequin will probably go for lower than the RTX 3060 on the secondhand market.

It is a card that squarely targets 1080p and manages to hit the mark.

Though I listed my 1080p Extremely outcomes, optimizing just a few settings can characterize huge will increase in body charge. The RX 6600 jumped to 83frames per second (fps) in Murderer’s Creed Valhalla with the Excessive current, for instance, and Battlefield V produced 158 fps with the Medium preset.

It shouldn’t come as a shock that decision is the killer, even when the RX 6600 can carry out in some video games at 1440p. It stilled managed 55 fps in Purple Lifeless Redemption at 1440p, which is spectacular contemplating how demanding that recreation is. In a much less demanding title like Civilization VI, the RX 6600 was in a position to squeeze out above 100 fps, and it even managed to go above 60 fps at 4K.

Civilization VI was the one recreation I might handle at 4K, although. The cardboard produced a pitiful 26 fps in Purple Lifeless Redemption 2 and couldn’t crack the 30 fps mark in Fortnite. With out the assistance of FidelityFX Tremendous Decision (FSR), 4K is out of the query for the RX 6600. Whereas 1440p is manageable, this can be a card that squarely targets 1080p and manages to hit the mark.

Content material creation

PugetBench for Premiere Pro benchmark.

AMD playing cards usually underperform in comparison with Nvidia ones for content material creation workloads — and the RX 6600 doesn’t change that. It is a 1080p gaming card, however my outcomes (particularly in Blender) present that you should use it for content material creation, and typically even better off over Nvidia.

AMD RX 6600 AMD RX 6600 XT Nvidia RTX 3060 RTX 2060 Tremendous
Blender BMW (seconds) 86 79 45 58
Blender Classroom (seconds) 167 155 208 275
Blender Koro (seconds) 156 139 162 183
PugetBench for Premiere Professional (total rating) 605 625 703 784

In two out of the three Blender renders I examined, the RX 6600 managed to beat the RTX 3060 and RTX 2060 Tremendous (although, these playing cards beat the RX 6600 within the BMW render by a major margin). However we’re evaluating apples to oranges right here. Blender is ready to make the most of CUDA or OptiX for GPU rendering. AMD playing cards are restricted to OpenCL.

OptiX supplies an unfair benefit for Nvidia. It’s simply manner sooner than OpenCL, and even supplies a major benefit over CUDA rendering. Though my outcomes favor the RX 6600, they don’t inform the complete story. If Blender is an software you intend on utilizing rather a lot, it’s greatest to stay with an Nvidia card.

PugetBench illustrates Nvidia’s lead in content material creation extra. Right here, the RTX 3060 outperforms the RX 6600 by about 16%, factoring within the all the parts of the machine. The RX 6600 is able to operating these applications, however you’ll wish to put money into a stable CPU and RAM equipment to get the most effective efficiency.

Tremendous Decision and ray tracing

Like different RX 6000 playing cards, the RX 6600 comes with two wonderful options — AMD Tremendous Decision and hardware-accelerated ray tracing. Similar to its RDNA 2 siblings, although, the RX 6600 doesn’t deal with ray tracing with grace. It comes right down to a design distinction between AMD and Nvidia playing cards that favors Staff Inexperienced much more.

AMD RX 6600 AMD RX 6600 XT Nvidia RTX 3060 RTX 2060 Tremendous
Management no ray tracing 67 fps 73 fps 76 fps 75 fps
Management ray tracing 27 fps 34 fps 47 fps 41 fps
Cyberpunk 2077 no ray tracing 46 fps 62 fps 59 fps 55 fps
Cyberpunk 2077 ray tracing 10 fps 13 fps 28 fps 25 fps

My common body charge tanked by practically 60% in Management and a large 78% in Cyberpunk 2077 with ray tracing on. I ran all of those checks at 1080p with the highest-quality preset, controlling particularly for ray tracing. Which means I didn’t use Nvidia Deep Studying Tremendous Sampling (DLSS). The outcomes above are pure ray tracing efficiency.

And AMD doesn’t look nice. The RX 6600 has some huge drops, which I anticipated. You may see from my RX 6600 XT outcomes that this can be a development for AMD. That’s as a result of Nvidia playing cards use a devoted ray tracing processor, whereas AMD playing cards embody an accelerator in every compute unit. My RTX 3060 and RTX 2060 Tremendous outcomes present how a lot a distinction that design change makes.

Following within the footsteps of the RDNA 2 playing cards that got here earlier than, the RX 6600 doesn’t look robust right here.

Regardless, not one of the outcomes above are playable with ray tracing on. You want an upscaling characteristic to benefit from the demanding rendering. AMD gives Tremendous Decision, which might enhance body charges by rather a lot. Take the latest Again 4 Blood, which showcased as much as a 116% improve in its aggressive Efficiency mode.

FSR can enhance your body charges, however it doesn’t look nearly as good because the Nvidia-exclusive DLSS. As well as, FSR doesn’t at all times accompany ray tracing in video games. Management and Cyberpunk 2077 are two prime examples. Each video games assist ray tracing and DLSS — which you often discover collectively — however neither helps FSR.

AMD RX 6600 among other graphics cards.

Tremendous Decision is a good characteristic, however it’s not a cause to purchase the RX 6600. The characteristic is accessible on mainly any graphics card. DLSS is a cause to purchase an Nvidia card, although, as is the massive enhance in ray tracing efficiency.

Following within the footsteps of the RDNA 2 playing cards that got here earlier than, the RX 6600 doesn’t look robust right here.

Our take

The AMD RX 6600 is as costly because the RTX 3060 whereas not performing as effectively, and it lacks options like high quality ray tracing and DLSS. The largest consider its favor is that AMD playing cards are promoting for lower than Nvidia ones on the secondhand market. It nonetheless manages clean 1080p gaming in most video games, even when it falls in need of the Nvidia competitors.

Proper now, it’s a timing concern. When you want a graphics card, the RX 6600 will probably be one of many least expensive choices from the previous couple of generations. When you can snag one at launch, there’s no contest. However the RTX 3060 is quicker, and even last-gen’s RTX 2060 Tremendous has a leg up in some titles. That’s to not point out the RTX 3060 Ti, which is well the most effective 1080p graphics card available on the market.

I’m nearly obligated to suggest the RX 6600 as a result of there’s an opportunity you’ll be able to choose one up at record value. That doesn’t imply it’s an ideal graphics card in comparison with the competitors If market situations have been completely different, I can solely surprise how AMD would value this card — and I doubt it could be $329.

Is there a greater various?

Sure. The RTX 3060 is about 8% sooner and has the identical record value, and the RX 6600 XT is over 20% sooner for less than $50 extra.

How lengthy will it final?

The RX 6600 already struggles to take care of 60 fps in demanding titles like Purple Lifeless Redemption 2 at 1080p. If you wish to play the most recent video games with the settings turned up, the RX 6600 will begin to really feel underpowered inside a few years. When you’re targeted on esports and fewer demanding video games, it would final for a few years to return.

Must you purchase it?

At record value, sure, however perceive that you simply’re shopping for the second-best choice. The RTX 3060 already isn’t an ideal graphics card contemplating its value, however it’s nonetheless sooner than the RX 6600. In an excellent world, I’d suggest choosing up an RTX 3060 Ti. However that’s not attainable for most individuals contemplating how costly they’re on the secondhand market.

Editors’ Suggestions

About Author

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Translate »